Mike Ferguson has received more than $40,000 directly from Tom DeLay or his PAC. That makes Congressman Ferguson the number one congressional recipient of money from Tom DeLay. If you look at money associated with Tom DeLay, including former employees and fundraisers organized by DeLay, that total reaches beyond $184,000.
Since Tom DeLay is under an ethical cloud, many people (including the Blue 7th PAC), have questioned the ethics of accepting the money.
In response to questions in both public and private, Rep. Ferguson has maintained that he ses no ethical issue. He is not, he said, beholden to anyone who contributes to his campaigns. Instead, he says, these people are buying into his philosophy.
If Mr. Ferguson believes that contributors to campaigns are buying into the candidate's philosophy, then he must agree that when he makes contributions to another person's campaign he is buying into their philosophy.
On June 30, 2005 Congressman Michael Ferguson's leadership political action committee, MIKE PAC, contributed $1,000 to Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum's campaign. As such, Rep. Ferguson is asserting that he is buying into Sen. Santorum's philosophy.
That would include this gem that Rep. Ferguson has yet to disavow:
Senator Santorum has recently been in the news for reaffirming what he wrote on the website Catholic Online in 2002 regarding the priest abuse scandal:
Priests, like all of us, are affected by culture. When the culture is sick, every element in it becomes infected. While it is no excuse for this scandal, it is no surprise that Boston, a seat of academic, political and cultural liberalism in America, lies at the center of the storm.
Through a spokesman, Senator Santorum recently repeated this claim that "cultural liberalism" is to blame for the church sex scandal.
Senator Santorum also suggests that Americans do not have a Consitutionally gauranteed right to privacy that has been repeatedly upheld by the Supreme Court. In fact, Senator Santorum suggests he would like to eliminate that right.
this right to privacy that doesn't exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution [snip] The right to privacy is a right that was created in a law that set forth a (ban on) rights to limit individual passions. And I don't agree with that. So I would make the argument that with President, or Senator or Congressman or whoever Santorum, I would put it back to where it is, the democratic process.
Please call Rep. Ferguson's office at 908-757-7835 and ask his staffers if the Congressman stands by Senator Santorum's comments. You can also write to Rep. Ferguson on his website e-mail form.
Another avenue is to send letters to the editor talking about the divisive and insulting comments made by Senator Santorum. Local and regional newspapers are as follows: the Courier News at letters@c-n.com, the Home News Tribune at letters@thnt.com, the Star Ledger at eletters@starledger.com, or the New York Times at letters@nytimes.com.